Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Head v Smith
as 2:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Karen Head
Defendant:
James M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Richard vs Thaler etal
as 9:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anthony Joseph Richard
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Brad Livingston, Oliver J. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00371
Plaintiff:
Paul Smith and Ryanne M Smith
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Chase Home Finance LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Guerrero v. King Jr et al
as 9:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ruben Guerrero
Defendant:
Wade A King Jr, Jan M Smith, Craig A Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Oliver et al
as 9:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Leslie Morgan
Defendant:
Gregory Oliver, Benjey B Ferguson, Jay A North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addicks v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Addicks, Jr
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Doug Dretke, R Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv00561
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Joseph M Smith, Saterria M Anderson, Doris H Cruse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Freeman et al
as 1:2007cv00563
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Wesley E Freeman, Joseph M Smith, Timothy Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Quintant
as 1:2007cv00147
Petitioner:
Delynn M. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Quintant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
