Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Woods v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
John Lee Woods
Defendant:
Warden II Brian Cooper, Asst Warden Traci L Shirey, Asst Warden Michael A Collum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padieu v. Philips et al
as 6:2020cv00631
Plaintiff:
Philippe Padieu
Defendant:
Kirt Stiefer, Michael Sizemore, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baughman v. Bowman et al Division.
as 6:2020cv00560
Respondent:
Melissa Ballard, Betty Reeves, Johnathan Teaff and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bakre v. Kendall et al
as 6:2019cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ash B Bakre
Defendant:
Doctor FNU Abron, Deborah Kendall, Michael Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogus v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, LeeAnn Spears-Hollis, Jimmy Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Brett David Bogus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrott Jr. v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 6:2019cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Mark Parrott Jr.
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Stiles Unit Medical Department, Powledge Unit Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody et al v. Collier et al
as 6:2019cv00056
Plaintiff:
James White, Galvin Rice, James Woods and others
Defendant:
Tracy Pearson, Norris Jackson, Brain Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thaler et al
as 9:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jessie L Johnson
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Oliver Bell, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon, Jr. v. Dretke et al
as 9:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramon, Jr.
Defendant:
Doug Dretke, Michael Sizemore, Bill Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Furr et al
as 9:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joe Parker
Defendant:
Corey Furr and Michael Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
