Cases 1 - 9 of 9
IOT Innovations LLC v. Snap One, LLC
as 2:2024cv00704
Defendant:
Snap One, LLC
Plaintiff:
IOT Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stingray IP Solutions LLC v. Snap One Holdings Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Stingray IP Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Snap One Holdings Corp. and Snap One, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC
as 2:2016cv00992
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA, Inc and Uniloc USA, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Avaya Inc., ZTE (TX), Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd. and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Electronics Inc., ZTE (USA), Inc., Shoretel, Inc. and others
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Edward A Infante and Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Banertek LLC v. Snap Interactive, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00836
Plaintiff:
Banertek LLC
Defendant:
Snap Interactive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tangelo IP, LLC v. Snap-On Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tangelo IP, LLC
Defendant:
Snap-On Incorporated and Snap-On Tools Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
VideoSqope, LLC v. Snap-On Incorporated
as 6:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
VideoSqope, LLC
Defendant:
Snap-On Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gonzalez v. Snap Interactive
as 2:2014cv00991
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel C. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Snap Interactive
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gonzalez v. Snap Interactive, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel C. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Snap Interactive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Orion IP, LLC v. Snap-On Incorporated et al
as 6:2007cv00296
Plaintiff:
Orion IP, LLC, Orion IP, LLC, Orion IP, LLC and others
Defendant:
Snap-On Incorporated and Snap-On Tools Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
