Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spearman v. Stephens et al
as 1:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Ashtin Spearman
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Shawnburger and FNU Guillory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spearman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2019cv00043
Petitioner:
Eddy Lee Spearman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00889
Plaintiff:
Mark Miller , Chris Spearman and Craig Stanford
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spearman v. Collier et al
as 9:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Eddy Spearman
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Kevin Wheat and Gregory Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman v. Stephen etal
as 9:2015cv00140
Plaintiff:
Eddy Lee Spearman
Defendant:
William Stephen, Brad Livingston, Jessie Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Slade et al v. City of Marshall Texas et al
as 2:2013cv01102
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Slade , C S Slade , Kim Spearman and others
Defendant:
City of Marshall Texas, Stanley Spence, Johnston John and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spearman v. Bell et al
as 9:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Eddy Lee Spearman
Defendant:
Charles W. Bell, Debbie Erwin, Michael J Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglass et al v. Beakley et al
as 6:2012mc00005
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. Douglass, Scott P. Douglass, Samuel K. Douglass and others
Receiver:
Fernando M. Bustos
Defendant:
John William Beakley, Mary Adams Beakley, Meghan Beakley and others
Spearman v. Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00735
Petitioner:
Sedrick Dewayne Spearman
Respondent:
Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Henderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
James Charles Davis
Defendant:
Henderson County Sheriff's Department, Ira Spearman, FNU Fulmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
