Cases 1 - 10 of 3,863
Edwards, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00382
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Edwards, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Director, TDCJ-CID ***Case transferred to SDTX, Houston Division***
as 6:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Jesus Turner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00174
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Eric Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wild v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00800
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Craig Merlin Wild
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00806
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Garrison Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00808
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Ivan E. Holbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
John A. Grimes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00757
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
David Martin Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00296
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Northington Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morriss v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Christopher Wayne Morriss
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
