Cases 101 - 110 of 11,386
MacDonald et al v. US Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
Duncan John MacDonald and The Duncan MacDonald Family
Defendant:
US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Werfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. V.A. Hospital
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
James C Davis
Defendant:
V.A. Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Henderson v. West
as 3:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Tisha Henderson
Defendant:
Royce West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Henderson et al
as 3:2024cv01241
Defendant:
Tisha Henderson and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Rodsdricke Martin
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Texas Health Resources, Leslie McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mack v. Swartz et al
as 3:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Swartz, Ayinde Immanuel Ashford, Kerry P Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
