Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Morgan v. Wilson
as 3:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Morgan
Defendant:
Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv04758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GarVest, Ltd. et al v. Wilson et al
as 3:2011cv03322
Plaintiff:
GarVest, Ltd. , Public Storage of Dallas, Ltd. and LBJ-Central
Defendant:
J.T. Wilson, Tim Davis and Dallas Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wilson v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv01306
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation and Huge American Restaurants Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2011cv00879
Plaintiff:
Linda Pearl Wilson
Defendant:
Dallas County , Dallas County Commissioners Court , Jaime Cortes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wilson v. Oak Cliff Tower Limited et al
as 3:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Oak Cliff Tower Limited and Oak Cliff Tower GP Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
White et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2010cv02528
Defendant:
Dallas County, Dallas County Hospital District, Arif M Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. White and Sandra E. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. I.T.M.O.A.W.M. #1-7 et al
as 3:2010cv02522
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wilson
Defendant:
I.T.M.O.A.W.M. #1-7, The United States of America and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
