Cases 1 - 10 of 11,370
Johnson v. MNSF II WI LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Kasha Louise Johnson
Defendant:
MNSF II WI LLC, Bridge & SFR IV Seed Borrower, Bridge Investment Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Craig et al v. Tarrant County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Craig and Devan Webb
Defendant:
Tarrant County Sheriffs Office, John Doe, I and John Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Godfrey et al v. Morales et al
as 3:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
Jakema Godfrey and JLH
Defendant:
NFN Morales and Kaufman County Constables
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edmunds Lewis v. City of Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Megan C. Edmunds Lewis
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Petitioner:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Respondent:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
