Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03455
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Choice Dynamic Media, L.P. v. City of Lubbock et al
as 5:2018cv00172
Defendant:
Councilman Jeff Griffith, Councilman Juan Chadis, Councilman Steve Massengale and others
Plaintiff:
Choice Dynamic Media, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Allen Thomas
Defendant:
The State of Texas , Johnson County Texas , Bob Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Griffith v. City of Arlington, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Griffith
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Texas , Charlie Parker , Kathryn Wilemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lowe v. UHF Magnolia Trace LP et al
as 3:2014cv01460
Plaintiff:
Sherri R Lowe and Shirley Lowe-Griffith
Defendant:
UHF Magnolia Trace LP, Bridgett Rainey and SunChase American Ltd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. City of White Settlement Texas et al
as 4:2009cv00620
Plaintiff:
Brookes Baker, Brookes Baker, Brookes Baker and others
Defendant:
City of White Settlement Texas and Randell G Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dallas Roof Gardens Inc v. The City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2007cv00696
Plaintiff:
Dallas Roof Gardens Inc, Dallas Roof Gardens Inc, Dallas Roof Gardens Inc and others
Defendant:
The City of Dallas Texas, The City of Dallas Texas, Reinvestment Zone Five Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
