Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamborello v. Town of Highland Park, Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Emily Gilmore, Tobin Maples, Russell Nance and others
Plaintiff:
Sam C Tamborello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bridges v. The City of Cisco
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jacob DeWayne Bridges
Defendant:
The City of Cisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Jack et al
as 4:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Ginger L. Edwards
Defendant:
Grant H. Jack, Richard "Dick" Smith, Dallas District Atty's Ofc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alexander v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Alexander
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners Inc, Philip R Taft Psy D & Associates PLLC, Jacob Parras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
