Cases 121 - 130 of 32,976
Johnson v. Sherrill et al
as 7:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
McKenzie H. Sherrill, Bryan D. Reitsma and Kevin B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent and Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens-Sharp v. USA
as 3:2024cv00723
Petitioner:
She-Daria Latisha Owens-Sharp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boykin v. Liddell El Bey
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Torey Boykin
Defendant:
Tony Liddell El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Junes et al
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Defendant:
Judge Steven Junes, District Attorney Phil Sorrells, Bill Waybourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Schiwart et al
as 7:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tyrone La'Shawn Clay
Defendant:
Carl Schiwart, Jana Harrison, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. UFN
as 3:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Marion Ray Mosley
Defendant:
ULN UFN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Eastland County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Jason Derrell Cooper
Respondent:
Eastland County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez Munoz v. USA
as 3:2024cv00811
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Gomez Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
