Cases 11 - 20 of 443
Troncozo v. Amarillo Police Department
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jorge Troncozo
Defendant:
Amarillo Police Department and Joe D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv02532
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Thurman Randle
Defendant:
Marian Brown, Malcolm Harden, City of Grand Prairie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniell v. Fuller, et al
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniell
Defendant:
James Fuller, Brown County Jail, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv01105
Petitioner:
Braylin Lamont Brown
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Dallas County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor, Sr
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriffs Office, NFN McGraw, NFN Thigpen and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lubbock County Court et al
as 5:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Willie Brown
Respondent:
Lubbock County Court and Lubbock County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown v. Martinez et al
as 5:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brown
Defendant:
Rick Martinez and Giles Dalby Unit Medical Staff and Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browning v. USA
as 3:2023cv01882
Petitioner:
Tony Demon Browning
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Wayburn
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
John Brown Lewis, IV
Respondent:
FNU Wayburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
