Cases 11 - 20 of 280
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00787
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beason v. Brown County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Beason
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriff's Department, Carlisle Gover, FNU Benefeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv01155
Petitioner:
Gary Dion El-Amin-Bey, LaDarius RaShad Rivers-El and LaDarius RaShad Rivers
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Joseph Richards
Respondent:
Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Warner v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02459
Petitioner:
Gary Wayne Warner
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberts Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00933
Petitioner:
Gary Gene Roberts Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Ma'at
as 1:2022cv00139
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FNU Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gonzales v. Klein et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Felix Klein, Scot Say, NFN Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satchel v. Maddox
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Satchel, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Gary Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
