Cases 31 - 40 of 330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Brandy Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker et al v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Matthew Baker, Robert Andrews, Timothy Cone and others
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Luis Enrique Rivera
Defendant:
Adam R. Gonzales, Teresa S. Martinez, Nicholas C. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Brandy Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Washington and David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Brandy Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
David Washington and David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
