Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Rogers v. Davis
as 4:2020cv00418
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Petitioner:
Kent Altonio Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Unnamed Respondent
as 4:2020cv00419
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Petitioner:
Kent Altonio Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00666
Defendant:
Warden, Nathan Quarterman, Byrd Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooton v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020cv00487
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Hooton
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Davis
as 4:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Warden Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Doc. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zamora v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020cv00233
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roger Zamora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rogers v. Collier et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Elby Rogers
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Glen Stouder, Jody Hefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rogers
as 7:2019cv00131
Defendant:
Joe Wendell Rogers
Plaintiff:
Randy Ray Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv02818
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. PO's APD et al
as 1:2019cv00210
Defendant:
PO's APD, Court of Taylor County, Court of Jones County and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.