Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Byrd v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Lashan Byrd
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Timothy Wade Burson, Ana Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poston v. USA
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lucas Wade Poston
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Tyler, Jr
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Bryan Collier, Logan T Shedd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Turner et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal and Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
A Turner, T Martinez and Wade T Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulsey v. Bishop et al
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hulsey
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, FNU Moore, FNU Traywick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohannon v. Ennis Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Heath Wade Bohannon
Defendant:
Ennis Police Department, Ashly Evelyn Bohannon, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yannis v. Lubbock Police Dept. et al
as 5:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Victor Yannis
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Dept., Wade Iverson and Muleshoe Texas Bailey County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
