Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00117
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundahl v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01017
Petitioner: Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent: M. Smith, Merrick Garland, Collete Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ward v. Romeo et al
as 6:2021cv00051
Plaintiff: Marshall Todd Ward
Defendant: Leza Romeo, Jason Chatham, Collin County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. United States Postal Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01172
Plaintiff: Cedric Greene
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. United States Postal Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00236
Plaintiff: R Wayne Johnson
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. Postal Service Deliverer
as 3:2018cv02640
Plaintiff: Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant: Postal Service Deliverer
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Willis v. Fitzsimmons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02607
Plaintiff: Drake Lafayette Willis
Defendant: Gary Fitzsimmons, Craig Watkins, NFN Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Postal Service (U.S.) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00177
Plaintiff: R Wayne Johnson
Defendant: Postal Service (U.S.) and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpless v. Postal Service
as 3:2014cv00614
Plaintiff: Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant: Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sharpless v. US Federal Clerk et al
as 3:2013cv03614
Plaintiff: Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant: US Federal Clerk and US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?