Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Sparks v. USA
as 4:2023cv01019
Petitioner:
Koby Lee Sparks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Johnston et al
as 7:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
Bob Johnston, Matt Frost, Jonathan Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. John Doe
as 7:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Peters
Defendant:
John Doe (7:22-CV-48-O), Bob Johnston, Sheriff Dept Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Holmes et al
as 4:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
John Sparks
Defendant:
Samantha Holmes, Bruce Isaacks, Hon. Lee Ann Breading and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. City of Lancaster Texas et al
as 3:2021cv03027
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Woods
Defendant:
City of Lancaster Texas, Lancaster Police Department, R Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v.Bedford Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv03028
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Woods
Defendant:
Bedford Police Department, City of Bedford Texas, City of Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fisher v. Murdock et al
as 7:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Douglas Fisher
Defendant:
Major Todd Murdock, Sgt Payton Rodriguez and James Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Lufkin
as 4:2021cv00853
Petitioner:
Oliver James Sparks
Respondent:
Brian Lufkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sparks v. Wilson et al
as 7:2020cv00030
Defendant:
BODA/Texas Supreme Court, State Bar of Texas and Sharen Wilson
Plaintiff:
Jayson Neil Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
