Cases 41 - 50 of 338
Ramseur v. USA
as 3:2022cv00749
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Ramseur
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alexander v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00028
Petitioner:
Johnny Earl Alexander
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bejjani v. Price et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Roy Romeo Bejjani
Defendant:
Edward Earl Price, Brittany Roberts and Thomas Contracting, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kates v. USA
as 2:2022cv00008
Petitioner:
David Earl Kates
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phillips v. Tarrant County, Fort Worth, Texas
as 4:2021cv01362
Plaintiff:
Donnie Earl Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Tarrant County, Fort Worth, Texas, Robert Ray Cowie, Dunham and Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khaled v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2021cv02939
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Khaled
Defendant:
United States Department of State, US Embassy in Bangladesh, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ramseur v. USA
as 3:2021cv02934
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Ramseur
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00202
Petitioner:
Kevin Earl Scott
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrydale Capital, LLC v. Barrett et al
as 3:2021xc02750
Defendant:
Nicholas Suazo, Owen Barrett, Grant Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Terrydale Capital, LLC and Terrydale Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terrydale Capital LLC v. Barrett et al
as 3:2021cv02755
Defendant:
Nicholas Suazo, Owen Barrett, Grant Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Terrydale Capital, LLC and Terrydale Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
