Cases 51 - 60 of 92
Medina v. Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 6:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Macario Medina
Defendant:
Texas Department of Public Safety and Mark Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Medina
as 4:2014cv00095
Respondent:
Juan L Medina
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Medina et al v. JIK Arbors of Las Colinas LLC
as 3:2013cv03263
Plaintiff:
Oliver Medina and Richard E. Simpson
Defendant:
JIK Arbors of Las Colinas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Borrego v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00939
Plaintiff:
Leocadio Medina Borrego
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Molina v. Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina Molina
Defendant:
Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility, Dalby Correctional Officers 1-100 and Dalby Correctional Facility 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04090
Plaintiff:
John Medina and Aida Medina
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
