Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Amsden et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
Donna Amsden , Diane Smith , Jodi Blair and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blair v. USA
as 3:2011cv02932
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Montreal Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones-Blair Company v. Thermoset Roofing Corporation
as 3:2011cv02025
Plaintiff:
Jones-Blair Company
Defendant:
Thermoset Roofing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
U.S. Foam & Coatings, Inc. v. Jones-Blair Company
as 3:2010cv02465
Plaintiff:
U.S. Foam & Coatings, Inc.
Defendant:
Jones-Blair Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nickols v. Morris et al
as 4:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
DeAnna Blair Nickols
Defendant:
Gary Morris, NFN Smith and Bill Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Blair et al v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Blair and Hal Wright
Defendant:
Alfonso Cardenas, Mesquite Community Hospital, Don Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
