Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Felix Fernando Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe, Gray County Jail, Gracie Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Santos v. Martez Rhodes et al
as 3:2023cv02366
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Santos
Defendant:
Kenzarious Martez Rhodes and PNM Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Arbaiza v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01788
Petitioner:
Santos Arbaiza
Respondent:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fermin v. Charles Schwab et al
as 4:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
Santos Fermin
Defendant:
Charles Schwab, Tides of Randol Mill and DNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Marsh et al
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Santos Gomez
Defendant:
Jessica Marsh, Joshua Castro, Kara Gougler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
