Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Barron v. American Advisors Group et al
as 5:2022cv00092
Plaintiff: Bernardo M Barron
Defendant: American Advisors Group, Reverse Mortgage Funding, LLC, American Advisors Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00009
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00073
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gutierrez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00074
Plaintiff: Bernardo Gutierrez
Defendant: Alonso Ammsord and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guandarrama v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03201
Plaintiff: Bernardo Guandarrama
Defendant: BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawk et al v. Pershing LLC
as 3:2015cv00747
Plaintiff: Tom Hawk , Claude Dumont De Hawk , Guillermo Aceto and others
Defendant: Pershing LLC
Hernandez v. TDCJ Parole Division
as 7:2014cv00030
Plaintiff: Bernardo Hernandez
Defendant: TDCJ Parole Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Wathern We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00106
Petitioner: Bernardo Hernandez
Respondent: Richard Wathern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neto et al v. Dmcc Enterprise Inc et al
as 3:2013cv03528
Plaintiff: Jose Bernardo Neto , Fernando Lopez De Oliveira and Francisco Oliveira
Defendant: Dmcc Enterprise Inc and Meei Ling Chu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?