Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lane et al v. Conestoga Settlement Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Jackson, Deatra Lane, Eberle Family Trust and others
Defendant:
Conestoga Trust Services LLC, LL Bradford and Company LLC, James Settlement Services, LLC and others
Ortiz v. Uber Technologies Inc
as 3:2020cv00093
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Andrea C Jackson and Uber Technologies Inc
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03234
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jackson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01661
Petitioner:
Raymond C Jackson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02271
Petitioner:
Raymond C Jackson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wyatt et al v. Dallas County Sheriff's Department Employees et al
as 4:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr., Mark Johnson, Dwight C. Jackson and others
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriff's Department Employees, Dallas City Warrant Office, Parkland Health & Hospital System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Wal Mart Stores Inc
as 3:2012cv01675
Plaintiff:
Cristina C Jackson
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
United States of America v. Jackson et al
as 3:2010cv02224
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joseph B Jackson, Sr
Garnishee:
American Airlines Inc , Chase Investment Services Corp , Citigroup Inc and others
Movant:
Unjaleek C Jackson
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
