Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Grizzle v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2024cv00180
Defendant:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-180-H-1, Brenda G. Gardnes, Clayton J. Arrendall and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estrada v. Warden, FCI Danbury
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Leonela Estrada
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Estrada v. Dallas Morning News
as 3:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
Anita Estrada
Defendant:
Dallas Morning News
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc v. Collins et al
as 3:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Defendant:
Evelyn Collins, Jose N. Estrada, Juan O. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00193
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Estrada v. Stearns
as 1:2022cv00138
Petitioner:
Luz Claudio Estrada
Respondent:
FNU Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Estrada v. Norton et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
David Estrada
Defendant:
Robert W Norton, Daniel R Broadus, John Doe #1, 1-22-cv-73 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
