Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Baker v. Murff
as 4:2017cv00933
Plaintiff: Vincent L. Baker
Defendant: C. Murff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. Baker et al
as 2:2015cv00343
Plaintiff: Dyrian K. Strong
Defendant: Jamie L Baker, Joe Milbern, Susan Dockery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Baker et al
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff: Rocky Hill
Defendant: Jamie L Baker, Joe B Milbern, Joshua L Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Baker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00067
Plaintiff: Ronroyal J Owens
Defendant: Jamie L Baker, Gerald Wayne Whitfield, Jr and Jill Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Baker et al
as 2:2013cv00170
Plaintiff: Forrest Lee Stokes
Defendant: Jamie L Baker, Michael Hooten, Darrell K Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskin et al v. Hughes, Watters & Askanase LLP et al
as 3:2012cv05272
Plaintiff: Mia Hoskin and David M Wethy
Defendant: Hughes, Watters & Askanase LLP, Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Baker v. Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00183
Petitioner: Debra L Baker
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2011cv03593
Plaintiff: Dewey R Love , Morris E Davis , Donald L Baker and others
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Baker v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03497
Plaintiff: Carol L Baker
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Pena v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00223
Plaintiff: Oscar Pena
Defendant: John H Adams, Warden Sloan, Jamie L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?