Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 3:2019cv02406
Plaintiff:
Charli Rose Nichols fka Sheri Lynn Smith, Charli Rose Nichols and Sheri Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03687
Plaintiff:
Lynn Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Amarillo Nursing Center Inc
as 2:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Amarillo Nursing Center Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Beatrice Velasco et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02241
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP , AstraZeneca PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Bonner , Idalee Cathcart , Tammy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howle et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv02090
Plaintiff:
Howard Howle, Howard Howle, James Adams and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Quarterman et al
as 2:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Nathaniel A Quarterman, C Harrell, P Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Supreme Co. of the U.S. et al
as 2:2007cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Supreme Co. of the U.S., William K Suter, Charles R Fulbruge, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Quarterman
as 2:2007cv00129
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Quarterman
as 2:2007cv00105
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
