Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Pharmacy Corporation of America, Inc. v. Smyrna Management LLC
as 4:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Pharmacy Corporation of America, Inc. d/b/a Pharmerica and Pharmacy Corporation of America doing business as Pharmerica
Defendant:
Smyrna Management LLC, Laodicea Management, LLC, Sardis Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Revell v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00232
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, LLC, individually, American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cathy Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Revels v. Standard Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv01168
Defendant:
Standard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Andrea Revels
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Galindo et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd. et al
as 3:2017cv02550
Plaintiff:
Victor Galindo , Jesus Gomez , Susana Saucedo and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd GP LLC and M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Revels v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2017cv00667
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Respondent:
Bill E. Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Norwood et al
as 7:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
John Henry Jackson
Defendant:
Tommy L Norwood, Joesph Eastridge, Richard Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Revels v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00746
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Revels v. Williams et al
as 4:2014cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Defendant:
David Williams and Tim Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Revels v. Livingston
as 7:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Revels
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Cayton
as 3:2013cv03719
Plaintiff:
Dennis S Faulkner
Defendant:
Revels Cayton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
