Cases 131 - 140 of 12,417
Sturgeon v. Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only et al
as 4:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Paul Sturgeon
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas in his Official Capacity, Only, Texas State Attorney General and Harris County Texas Commission Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Neuens v. City of McAllen Police Department
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Chris Neuens
Defendant:
City of McAllen Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Borchers v. Menchaca et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jason Borchers
Defendant:
Jesse Menchaca and Gilbert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barber v. Katy Independent School District et al
as 4:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
Staci Barber
Defendant:
Katy Independent School District and Bryan Scott Rounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
