Cases 11 - 20 of 691
Keen v. Onpoint Industrial Services
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mandy Keen
Defendant:
Onpoint Industrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pomier v. BrandSafway, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Thonolaus Darrell Pomier
Defendant:
BrandSafway, LLC, The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Rodgers v. Harris County Hospital District et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Yolanda Wall, Kimberly Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Rheavia Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sims v. First Transit Inc
as 4:2023cv04651
Plaintiff:
Jackquelyn Sims
Defendant:
First Transit Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Cruz v. Entegris, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04538
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Chavez Cruz
Defendant:
Entegris, Inc. and CMC Materials, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Narcisse v. Dean's Professional Services
as 4:2023cv04751
Plaintiff:
Daniel Narcisse
Defendant:
DEANS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES and Dean's Professional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Huerta v. City of Kingsville
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Huerta
Defendant:
City of Kingsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Salinas-Cavazos v. Amerant Bank, N.A.
as 4:2023cv04639
Plaintiff:
ANADELIA SALINAS-CAVAZOS
Defendant:
Amerant Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Hayes v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Hayes
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hillary v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 7:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Steven S Hillary
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.