Cases 121 - 130 of 133
Orozco v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00065
Petitioner:
David Orozco
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavazos v. Office of Personnel Management
as 1:2006cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ethelvina Cavazos
Defendant:
United States Office of Personnel Management, Linda M Springer, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
United States of America v. Lima
as 1:2009cv00158
Defendant:
Kenson Lima
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Hamner v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv01238
Plaintiff:
Russell Hamner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. The United States Of America et al
as 4:2008cv02350
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Williams
Defendant:
The United States Of America, Kevin M McNair and Michael P Shea
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
De La Fuente v. United States of America
as 5:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Fulgencio De La Fuente
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walker v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv01555
Plaintiff:
Demario Walker
Defendant:
United States of America and Attorney General of Texas
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hickerson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv01515
Plaintiff:
Mr. Calvin Hickerson, Sr
Defendant:
V.A.R.O., VA Medical Center and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Contreras et al v City of Edinburg et al
as 7:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Contreras and Mario Contreras
Defendant:
City Of Edinburg, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Manuel Alvarez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
