Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Muhammad v. R. Cruz et al
as 4:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Muhammad
Defendant:
R. Cruz, Mr. Carvlani and Mr. Rembarse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivens-Baker, Jr. v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, P. Samaniego, Andres Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03965
Petitioner:
Andrea De La Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz-Cruz v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Ruben Cruz-Cruz
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cruz v. Chapa et al
as 2:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Florencio Cruz, III
Defendant:
Armando Chapa, Sheriff Bill Mills and Aransas County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02224
Petitioner:
Erasto Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Mares
as 4:2023cv02070
Plaintiff:
Luis Hernandez Cruz
Defendant:
Ricardo Baca Mares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
