Cases 91 - 100 of 352
Pacheco-Morales v. Collier
as 4:2022cv02185
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Exec Director Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Isaac Kwarteng, Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poledore v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Poledore
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Supervisor John Doe and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Isaac Kwarteng, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Collier
as 4:2022cv01705
Petitioner:
Hurshell Wheeler
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Collier
as 4:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Wylie Jones
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv01580
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Richardson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Tim Fitzpatrick, A. Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. Thomas et al
as 4:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Sierra
Defendant:
Markell A. Thomas, Justin C. Sand-Wable, Christopher R. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterns v. ADS-PHOP Director Armstrong et al
as 4:2022cv01548
Plaintiff:
Sylvester F. Sterns
Defendant:
ADS-PHOP Director Armstrong, TDCJ Director Bryan Collier and TDCJ-ID Director of Classification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thunderhorse v. Collier
as 4:2022cv01511
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
