Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Bhatti et al v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv00881
Plaintiff:
Javed Bhatti and Lydia Bhatti
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R Gonzales, Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dimopoulos v. Blakeway et al
as 2:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
Theodore George Dimopoulos
Defendant:
Albert Wiley Blakeway, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Xing v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2007cv00723
Plaintiff:
Yan Xing
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Evelyn M Upchurch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mustafa et al v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv00560
Plaintiff:
Asif Mustafa and Sara A. Mustafa
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Sharon Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maringo v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 4:2007cv00469
Petitioner:
Denis Maringo
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Michael Chertoff and Alberto R. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Khan v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007mc00036
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Iqbal Khan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R Gonzales, Emilio T Gonzalez and others
Tong et al v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv00396
Plaintiff:
Weigang Tong and Yuching Lin
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T Gonzalez, Robert S Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ariwodo v. Landgrebe et al
as 4:2007cv00136
Petitioner:
Michael U Ariwodo
Respondent:
Kenneth Landgrebe, Alberto R Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
