Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Carr v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00445
Petitioner:
Raymond Earl Carr
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hebert v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
William Albert Hebert
Defendant:
Capt. Jones, Corp. Olaughlin, Sheriff Greg Capers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Troy Finner, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Interlinc Mortgage Services, LLC v. Fortner et al
as 4:2021cv00671
Defendant:
Garrett O'Leary, Lindsay Carr, Kenneth Springfield and others
Plaintiff:
Interlinc Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Acevedo et al
as 4:2020cv02084
Defendant:
Harris Health Department, Ed Gonzales, Art Acevedo and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carr v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 4:2020cv01603
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and RegionalCare Hospital Partners
Plaintiff:
Julie Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Box v. Seko Worldwide, LLC
as 6:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Box
Defendant:
TK Davis Holdings, Ltd. d/b/a Carr's Delivery Service, Seko Worldwide, LLC dba Seko Logistics, Seko Worldwide, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davila et al v. Stewart et al
as 4:2020cv00781
Plaintiff:
Shantria Carr and Yasin Davila
Defendant:
PAM Cartage Carriers, LLC and Billy Joe Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carr v. Everett
as 4:2019cv03428
Defendant:
Sheila Everett
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
