Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00018
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Harris v Rodriguez et al
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
James Allen Harris
Defendant:
Francisco J. Rodriguez, Rodolfo Diaz, Fernator J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC v. El Bosque Mexican Restaurant #3 Inc et al
as 4:2014cv03600
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
El Bosque Mexican Restaurant #3 Inc , Juan J. Rodriguez , Jaime Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hendershott v. Stephens DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 2:2014cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jason Hendershott
Defendant:
Kelly Strong, C Pansy, Dagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Livingston et al
as 3:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Roger D Pawelek, Robert G. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
Juan J Rodriguez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv03534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Rodriguez et al v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv03065
Plaintiff:
Hector J Rodriguez and Maria F. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and Jeffrey Bentley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Olivares et al v. MAB Flooring, Ltd. et al
as 4:2009cv00552
Plaintiff:
Conrado Olivares, Jose Luis Martinez Garcia, Raul G. Morales and others
Defendant:
MAB Flooring, Ltd., MAB Leasing and Services, Inc. and Marie A. Bell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
