Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv03413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Associated Automotive Inc v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
as 4:2009cv02374
Plaintiff:
Associated Automotive Inc
Defendant:
Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flanagan v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:08mc0637. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE
as 4:2008mc00637
Plaintiff:
Monica Flanagan
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prather v. Warrantech Automotive, Inc.
as 4:2008cv01957
Plaintiff:
Stephen Prather
Defendant:
Warrantech Automotive Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jack Shaw
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Botello et al v. Inguanzo et al
as 1:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Francisco Botello and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc
Defendant:
Eduardo Inguanzo and U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gonzales v. Afton Pumps Inc
as 4:2008cv00198
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Afton Pumps, Inc, Bondex International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Antonio Gonzales and Ana Candelaria Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
