Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Solis v. Gate Guard Services, L.P. et al
as 6:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
Gate Guard Services, L.P. , Sidney L. Smith and Bert Steindorf
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Solis v. Gate Guard Services, L.P. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 2:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
Gate Guard Services, L.P. , Sidney L. Smith and Bert Steindorf
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Wilson et al v. Navika Capital Group, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01569
Plaintiff:
Joanna Marie Wilson, Ashley Rachel DeLeon, Steve Vinkler and others
Defendant:
Navika Capital Group, LLC, Pearl Hospitality, LLC, Ruby Hospitality, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burke et al v. Allis-Chalmers Corp et al
as 4:2009cv03911
Plaintiff:
J.B. Burke, Lunetta Drake, Betty Echols and others
Defendant:
Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, American Optical Corporation, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Smith v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv02875
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline L Smith
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. A.S.A. Promotions, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01360
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
A.S.A. Promotions, Inc., Andre L. Smith and Yolanda Smith
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Vickery v. Smith et al
as 3:2007cv00575
Plaintiff:
Bobby Vickery
Defendant:
L Smith, A Collins, T Cono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
