Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Richey et al v. Total Technologies, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2010cv01730
Plaintiff:
Elvin Richey and Clifford Hestilow
Defendant:
Total Technologies, L.L.C. , Michael Murphy and Amy Murphy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Hayden v. Phillips et al
as 4:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Randy Hayden
Defendant:
Brenda R Phillips, Charlie D Phillips, S T G ( Unknown) Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Officer Pople et al
as 4:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III
Defendant:
Officer Pople, Chaney, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrotsky et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02645
Plaintiff:
Melvin Abrotsky, Steven Nels Aslin, William Paul Barnett and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ali et al v. R. Master & Sons, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01439
Plaintiff:
Asif Ali and Kahir Ali
Defendant:
R. Master & Sons, Inc., Shadow Oaks, Inc., Volume, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Livingston et al
as 4:2008cv03222
Plaintiff:
Alan Wade Johnson
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Jack Douglas, C Bell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Kukua et al
as 3:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Glenn Floyd Smith
Defendant:
Diane Kukua, Kenneth Negbenebor, Dirk Lorimeir and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Richey
as 2:2007cv00328
Plaintiff:
Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Defendant:
Janice Richey
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Green v. Ross et al
as 4:2007cv01948
Plaintiff:
Steve Oneal Green
Defendant:
Ross, Christopher Douglas and Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
