Cases 41 - 50 of 182
Burns Motors, Ltd. et al v. FCA USA LLC et al
as 7:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Burns Motors, Ltd. and Burns Income Properties, Ltd.
Defendant:
FCA USA LLC and Teresa McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRAVES et al v. ARKEMA INC. et al
as 4:2017cv03068
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY GRAVES , DAVID KLOZIK , BRICE OWENS and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
DAVID BAECKER , GAY MCCOY , KEVIN MCCOY and others
Defendant:
ARKEMA INC. , RICHARD RENNARD , RICHARD ROWE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nguyen v. Hoang et al
as 4:2017cv02060
Plaintiff:
Tu Nguyen
Defendant:
Dan Hoang, Diem Hoang Do, Doan Bui and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Burns v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv03280
Plaintiff:
Anthony Burns
Defendant:
William Stephens and Transporting Officer (Name Unknown)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Martinez et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 7:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sofia Martinez and Francisco Abelardo Martinez (deceased)
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Connie Medley, Joyce Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCall v. Stephens et al
as 4:2015cv00040
Petitioner:
Robert Burns McCall
Respondent:
William Stephens, R Cook, Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lince v. Pace et al
as 4:2014cv03180
Petitioner:
Christian Lince
Respondent:
Pam Pace, Bobby Burns, Boyd Unit Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
