Cases 1 - 10 of 189,765
Anderson v. Xtreme Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson
Defendant:
Xtreme Manufacturing, LLC and SKL Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alma Laura Garza
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robertson v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Robertson
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 American Disabilities Act of 1990
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
Jasper Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munoz v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
Jesica Munoz
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC v. B&L Equipment Rentals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02168
Plaintiff:
Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
Defendant:
B&L Equipment Rentals, Inc., Zurich American Insurance Company, Evanston Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Waldrup & Household v. Leva et al
as 4:2024cv02171
Plaintiff:
Aisha Waldrup & Household
Defendant:
Jeff Leva, Meghan Rolla, Stanley Middleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
