Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Ambrosio Reyna et al v. Han et al
as 7:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Nancy Reyna and Jaime Ambrosio Reyna
Defendant:
Devi Trucking Express Corp. and Feng Lai Han
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hans-Gaston v. Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC
as 4:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
Principal Hans-Gaston
Defendant:
Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huck v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Hans Huck
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gaedchens v. Ogg et al
as 4:2022cv02303
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. Gaedchens
Defendant:
Kim Ogg, Te'iva Bell, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hans-Gaston v. Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Principa Hans Gaston and Principal Hans-Gaston
Defendant:
Residence Inn by Marriott and Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 3005 Detention of Mail for Temporary Periods
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Max Tzaj v. Dong Jing International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jose Max Tzaj
Defendant:
Dong Jing International, Inc., Jin Han, LLC and Zhiping Wang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
