Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Noriega v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Oscar Noriega, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Oscar Rivera, City of Sinton, Texas and San Patricio County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Noriega v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Maria Gemila Noriega
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Noriega v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03549
Plaintiff:
Alex Noriega
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Noriega et al v. Maalin et al
as 7:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Abigail Noriega and Martin Alfaro, Jr.
Defendant:
Yahye Salad Maalin , Blue Star Freight, L.L.C. and Sahan Transport, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noriega-Alanis v. United States Of America
as 7:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Juan Francisco Noriega-Alanis
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hernandez et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 7:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez and Magdalena Hernandez
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds , Richard Freymann and Juan Noriega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Avance-Houston, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv03316
Plaintiff:
Shirley T. Wells
Defendant:
Avance-Houston, Inc. and Richard J. Noriega
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Delance v. Port Isabel Detention Center Faculty et al
as 1:2010cv00219
Petitioner:
Guillermo J Delance
Respondent:
Port Isabel Detention Center Faculty, W. Hamilton, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Ortis et al
as 1:2010cv00203
Petitioner:
Kemar R James
Respondent:
J Ortis , Fermin Lopez , Mark Cano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
