Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Keith Morris
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Jesse Jimenez, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Garza v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Brandon Garza
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Tanali Family Trust v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00154
Defendant:
Tanali Family Trust and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lucas v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03539
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Aaron Times
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2020cv02929
Plaintiff:
Alicia Thomas
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv02911
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Diversified Conveyors International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kevin James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
