Cases 91 - 100 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00183
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ag Petition for Removal - Age Discrimination
Cannon v. Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitation Services
as 1:2012cv00557
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nious Cannon
Defendant:
Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitation Services and Danielle Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin v. Niemeier et al
as 5:2012cv00552
Defendant:
Cillie Anderson, Stephanie Constante, Jane/John #1 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey B. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00347
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Yazdi v. Mowad et al
as 3:2011cv00016
Defendant:
Kelly Aguilar/Dickson, Duane Baker, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nasser Yazdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
