Cases 21 - 30 of 9,914
Parsons v. All Mailroom Staffing et al
as 6:2024cv00480
Defendant:
All Mailroom Staffing, All Waco Postmasters and Employees, All STG Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jolt Initiative, Inc. v. Paxton
as 1:2024cv01089
Plaintiff:
Jolt Initiative, Inc.
Defendant:
Attorney General Kenneth Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00331
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Woodward v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Defendant:
Baily Gray, Christopher Anderson, Edna Staniszewski and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Woodward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Pommells v. Hill County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00470
Defendant:
County Attorney David Holmes, Sheriff Rodney Watson, Lt. Marcia Feucht and others
Plaintiff:
Chaleb Elijah Pommells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pilkey v. 21st Mortgage Corporation
as 7:2024cv00219
Defendant:
21st Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Landon Pilkey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00325
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
