Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Harner-Brady v. McLane et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lynn Harner-Brady
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Office, April Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reader v. Graham et al
as 5:2023cv01024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daugherty Reader
Defendant:
Deputy Eric Graham, Deputy Jimmy Vasquez, Jr., Kerr County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Steel et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Micheal D. Johnson
Defendant:
Gary L. Steel, Francisco A. Argenal and Bradley D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burleson v. Pace et al
as 1:2021cv00857
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jedediah Burleson
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pace, Waco DPO-IV, Stephon Lightener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burleson v. Alvarez et al
as 6:2021cv00382
Plaintiff:
Samuel Burleson
Defendant:
Heidi Graham, Dwight Moody, Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jones v. City of Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv00253
Defendant:
Joel Graham, The City of Taylor, Texas and Robert Walla
Plaintiff:
Jacky Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callaway v. City of Austin et al
as 1:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Callaway and Caroline Callaway
Defendant:
City of Austin, Travis County, Patrick Oborski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard Soza v. Sean Graham et al
as 5:2014cv01058
Defendant:
John Doe and Sean Graham
Plaintiff:
Richard Soza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
