Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Grant v. Barr, et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, William Barr and James A. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gloria et al v. Hughs, Texas Secretary of State
as 5:2020cv00527
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Macri, Jennifer Ramos, Luis Botello-Faz and others
Defendant:
Ruth Hughs, Texas Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutt v. Llano Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00471
Defendant:
Aimee Shannon, Scott Edmonson, Jared Latta and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Nutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry v. City of Llano, Texas et al
as 1:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Cody Perry
Defendant:
Melissa Sloan, City of Llano, Texas, Matthew Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 6:2018cv00163
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
