Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Shaw v. Stephens
as 6:2013cv00318
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Petitioner: Bobby Joe Shaw
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackwell v. Thaler, et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Petitioner: Christopher Blackwell
Notice Only Party: Laura Haney
Respondent: Warden Shaw and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. United States Of America
as 5:2012cv00352
Plaintiff: Robert B. Shaw
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shaw v. United States Of America
as 6:2011cv00032
Petitioner: David Earl Shaw
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. Bragg et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Defendant: Jason K. Axe, Andre Birotte, Jr., M. Travis Bragg and others
Plaintiff: James S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00052
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joseph v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 5:2009cv00215
Plaintiff: Leroy Joseph
Defendant: Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Rissie Owens, Ryan Chamber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abdel-Malak v. Gonzalez et al
as 6:2007cv00377
Plaintiff: Fakri Abdel-Malak
Defendant: Juanita Gonzalez and Alvin Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Monroe et al
as 6:2007cv00107
Plaintiff: Timothy Shane Scott
Defendant: Robert Monroe, Breezy Stevens and Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?