Cases 51 - 60 of 633
De Los Reyes v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Francisco De Los Reyes
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branch v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
James Branch
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arredondo-Braaten v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Allen Arredondo-Braaten
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lampley v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Erick Anthony Lampley
Respondent:
Gene Miller and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Bart Gonzales Castro
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reedy v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Charles Reedy
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Felix Murphy, III
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sosa v. Director, TDCJ
as 5:2023cv01541
Petitioner:
Eddie R. Sosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amanico v. Lumpkin
as 7:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Pedro Castelo Amanico
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
